Brunson v Adams - An Average Person's Understanding of a Supremely Important Legal Case
The plaintiff (or person bringing this complaint before the court) is a man named Raland J. Brunson who is representing himself (praise God) along with his brothers Loy and DeRon. The defendants (the people Mr. Brunson is petitioning against) are 388 public functionaries (defined as persons elected or appointed to a government position of limited authority to conduct a particular constitutionally-based function for the public); namely the (illegally installed) Biden/Harris twosome, the now lame-duck speaker of the house Nancy Pelosi, the Vice President Mike Pence (I use the present tense because I firmly believe he is still the legitimate Vice President of the United States of America) and 384 public functionaries elected to the US congress seated during the November 3, 2020, election (coup d’etat).
All 388 of these above-mentioned persons have sworn an Oath to Protect and Defend the United States Constitution, as many of us have also sworn that same Oath.
The list of authoritative references used in this case are shown as the Table of Authorities on page 9 of the PDF copy of the Brunson case linked here:
In a nutshell this case states that these 388 individuals were warned about a “highly covert swift and powerful enemy” that was “seeking to destroy the Constitution and the United States” and they did nothing to stop it thereby committing treason and fraud (Page 3 of actual Proceedings – which is on Page 12 of the above-linked PDF copy) - That’s the Law.
Some of the highlight arguments in this case – which I believe should be a “case-study” case include:
1) The US and State Constitutions do not “grant rights to People” rather they “restrict the authorities granted to government by the People and they protect the rights of the People.” (Page 5 of the actual Proceedings – which is on Page 14 of the above-linked PDF copy). We should have our Children repeat this argument over and over again until they have it memorized.
2) Fraud makes everything it touches void. The word that attorneys and judges like to use rather than void (in a seeming effort to confuse the community about what is actually being said) is “vititates” but all that word actually means is to make void.
So in common language what Mr. Brunson is saying is that the excuses that the lower courts used to try to skirt their responsibility to hear this case were of no effect. And, of course those excuses included the usual ones:
lack of jurisdiction
You know. We the People have heard them all before, and We the People have allowed the courts to get away with using them for the longest time. I pray that time has come to an end.
This case is brilliant. In it, on Page 6 (Page 15 of the PDF copy) it states that because of the strengths of the facts of this case, Mr. Brunson felt no need to provide the supreme court with the defendant’s opposing arguments (I believe conversely it is because those arguments are so weak and without merit).
Mr. Brunson then asks for Immediacy in the supreme court because the National Security Threat continues on a daily basis.
One of the remedies that Mr. Brunson asks for, on behalf of every citizen of the USA, is the removal from office of all the above-mentioned public functionaries.
And, although this particular case before the supreme court does not specifically ask that President Trump and Vice President Pence be reinstated as the rightful winners of the November 3, 2020, election, it is requested in the original case that the lower courts dismissed on technicalities.
Guess What? On November 23, 2022, “the government” waived its right to respond to the petition on this case, unless requested by the court. I suggest that this means that “the government” can’t find holes in these arguments – and that’s Liberty!
Apparently the supreme court is holding their private hearing on January 6, 2023, to decide how to publicly address this case.
Here’s a link to an interview of brother Loy Brunson discussing the background of his brothers Raland and DeRon. their historical cases and the Power of the United States Constitution, as well as the Value of an Oath of Office and the Importance of States Rights (if you can carve out one hour and two minutes, I highly recommend that you listen to this entire presentation made by Loy Brunson before the entire world of media descended upon him ... it is very informative from start to finish and without all the noise from the media).
Also, the Brunson brothers are requesting that we send letters of support for this case to the US supreme court. The address of the supreme court is as follows:
Send separate letters to the attention of the chief justice John G, Roberts, Jr., associate justices Clarence Thomas, Sonia Sotomayor, Samuel A. Alto, Jr., Elena Kagan, Amy Coney Barrett, Neil M. Gorsuch, Brett M. Kavanaugh, Ketanji Brown Jackson informing all of them that you support this case. And send a copy to the Brunson brothers so that they know you sent your letter. The address to send their copy to is:
FINAL THOUGHT ON CASE 22-380: Mr. Brunson's case before the supreme court talks about the Object Principle of Justice and the Equitable Maxim that he says “kills” the Object Principle of Justice on Pages 7 and 8 on this supremely important supreme court case – this concept is so rich that it deserves a commentary all its own. So stay tuned!
If you would like to join MCU and become a part of the Judicial Accountability Niche Activism Team of legal case researchers and court watchers, send an email to
The other Niche Activism Teams that are forming within the Michigan Conservative Union Legislative Agenda are Second Amendment Nullification, Anti-Article V Convention, Education Exodus, and Reining in the Feds. If one of these Niche Activism Teams appeals to you, send us an email at
We need your help!
Don’t forget to join Michigan Conservative Union HERE. Formed in 1975, it’s the longest standing conservative activist group in Michigan; it ia growing in numbers and influence; and it’s all about Restoring Our American Republic.
If you would like to help finance the important work MCU is doing, please send your donations HERE. We sincerely appreciate your financial assistance in any amount large or small.
NOTE: All words in the above commentary that are in parantheses are the author's own definitions and opinions. The views, opinions, definititions in this commentary represent the work of the author, Janice Daniels, and do not necessarily reflect those of other MCU Directors or Members (although Janice prays that they really do)!