The Michigan 16 Under Dana’s Weaponized Democracy

On Thursday, August 11, 2023, we witnessed weaponized democracy (aka budding communism) in full force as nine of the sixteen Michigan Alternate Presidential Electors were individually arraigned right before our Zoom-fixed eyes on eight felony counts of forgery and uttering and publishing.

Jody and Janice checked in but were booted out!! Watch HERE

Excuse me, uttering and publishing is now a crime in the land of the free and the home of the brave?

Yep, it is, according to Dana’s weaponized democracy, which we know is a dangerous form of government that is truly repugnant to the republican form of government that is guaranteed to our Michigan Republic under Article 4, Section 4 of our United States Constitution.

In case you don’t remember, Article 4, Section 4 of the US Constitution reads:

“The United States shall guarantee to every state in this union a republican form of government, and shall protect each of them against invasion; and on application of the legislature, or of the executive (when the legislature cannot be convened) against domestic violence.”

And so exactly what laws are these Alternate Electors supposed to have violated?

Here's a copy of the actual Felony Complaints.

The rather vile accusers start with MCL Chapter 750 Section 157a.  It might interest you to note that MCL Chapter 750 Section 157a was added to the Michigan Compiled Laws on March 10, 1967, when Lyndon Johnson was occupying the White House and George Romney was Michigan’s governor. 

MCL 750.157a states that “Any person who conspires together with 1 or more persons to commit an offense prohibited by law, or to commit a legal act in an illegal manner is guilty of the crime of conspiracy punishable as provided herein …” ... but the punishments listed in subsections (a) through (c) of that Section are punishable by 1 year jail time or a fine of $10,000.

So when Counts 1, 4 and 7 of the charges filed under Dana’s Democracy state "5 years or $10,000," they must be referring to subsection (d) which states that “Any person convicted of conspiring to commit a legal act in an illegal manner shall be punished by imprisonment in the state prison for not more than 5 years or by a fine of not more than $10,000.00, or both such fine and imprisonment in the discretion of the court.”

I’m not an attorney so I don’t exactly understand how a legal act is committed in an illegal manner, but I digress. I am certain that the sixteen attorneys that are probably getting paid tall dollars to represent these unfortunate Michigan 16 should have a field (pay)day on this one.

As an aside, in our Republic, we like the so-called “law” to be precise, so I would suggest that Dana clear up this minor matter by clearly stating that they are relying upon 750-157a (d) to harass these fine Michigan citizens who, in my humble opinion, have done nothing “legal in an illegal manner.”

Counts 2 and 3 both cite MCL Chapter 750 Section 248 which was amended on March 19, 2020, while Joe Biden was occupying the White House and Gretchen Whitmer was occupying the Michigan’s gubernatorial office, that states “A person who falsely makes, alters, forges, or counterfeits a public record, or a certificate, return, or attestation of a clerk of a court, register of deeds, notary public, township clerk, or any other public officer, in relation to a matter in which the certificate, return, or attestation may be received as legal proof, or a charter, will, testament, bond, writing obligatory, letter of attorney, policy of insurance, bill of lading, bill of exchange, promissory note, or an order, acquittance of discharge for money or other property, or a waiver, release, claim or demand, or an acceptance of a bill of exchange, or indorsement, or assignment of a bill of exchange or promissory note for the payment of money, or an accountable receipt for money, goods, or other property with intent to injure or defraud another person is guilty of a felony punishable by imprisonment for not more than 14 years."

Now of course the accusers have picked and chosen fewer words out of that Section that they then used on their felony complaints. 

Here's how they condensed "the law" into what they needed it to say:  "did falsely make, alter, forge, or counterfeit a public record, with intent to injure or defraud ..."

But if you are going to condense a badly-written sentence into its fundamental essence, I would think it important to include at least the complete thought, as follows: "A person who falsely makes ... a public record ... in relation to a matter in which the certificate ... may be received as legal proof ... for the payment of money ... with the intent to injure or defraud ... is guilty of a felony." That is what the essence of this sentence says to me.

In fact, upon a little bit more consideration, it appears that this section of so-called laws actually only refers to financial transaction devices, as in credit accounts! We can confirm this by looking at subsection (a) which is attached to and made a part of Section 248 of Chapter 750. By the way, Section 248 subsection (a) was enacted on March 30, 1988, when globalist George H W Bush was occupying the White House and bureaucrat-extraordinaire James Blanchard was Michigan's governor. The important point here is 248(a) became "law" before the current iteration of 248 was amended to how it currently reads (the only way we would know what it said before the March 19, 2020, amendment was enacted would be to go to a law library and research historical records ... and who has the time for that).

The 1988 legislation called MCL Chapter 750 Section 248 Subsection (a)  states: "A person who utters and publishes as true any false, forged, altered, or counterfeit financial transaction device, as defined in section 157m, with the intent to injure or defraud any person is guilty of a felony."

When Section 248(a) cites MCL Chapter 750 Section 157M we only have to look to see that this is a 26-point definitions subsection, with all points referring to credit accounts (as in “financial transaction devices”) so how exactly are these duly-elected Michigan 16 electors guilty of “uttering or publishing” anything related to a “financial transaction device?”

I am pretty sure that after about five years of relentless judicial scheming and wrangling our honorable judiciary will find a penumbra (or a shadow) wherein they will be able to make something-out-of-nothing stick.

In fact, Counts 1, 2 and 3 all include a mention of 750.248  and Counts 4, 5 and 6 all mention 750.249 so let’s take a look at MCL 750.249 while we are at it.

MCL Chapter 750 Section 249 states that “(1) A person who utters and publishes as true a false, forged, altered, or counterfeit record, instrument, or other writing listed in section 248 knowing it to be false, altered, forged, or counterfeit with intent to injure or defraud is guilty of a felony punishable by imprisonment for not more than 14 years.”

As you might wish to know, Chapter 750 Section 249 was amended on January 1, 2012, while Barack Hussein Obama was occupying the White House and RINO Rick Snyder was Michigan’s governor. It sort of says pretty much the same thing and it references section 248 so of course I haven't a clue as to why our globalist friends felt a need to create Section 249, but they did.

They sure do know how to manipulate mangled so-called law, don’t they?

Now on to Counts 7 and 8 which rely upon snippets of the Michigan Election Law which are to be found in Chapter 168 of the 830 Chapters of Michigan Compiled Law - Yes, there are 830 Chapters in the Compiled Laws of Michigan (I have yet to figure out how this amount of regulation comports with Limited Government, but again I digress).

MCL Chapter Index

Both Counts 7 and 8 refer to Chapter 168 Section 933A which was added on December 28, 2018, while President Trump was in the White House and RINO Rick Snyder was Michigan’s governor.

That particular section states that a person is guilty of committing a felony if that person “Knowingly makes, files, or otherwise publishes a false document with the intent to defraud.”

Let’s look to the so-called US Code to see if we can get a precise legal definition of what a "false document" is (after looking at the US Code, I am pretty sure that James Madison would file this “Code Tome” under the warning he expressed in Federalist 62 wherein he opines that “It will be of little avail to the people, that the laws are made by men of their own choice, if the laws be so voluminous that they cannot be read, or so incoherent that they cannot be understood: if they be repealed or revised before they are promulgated, or undergo such incessant changes, that no man who knows what the law is today, can guess what it will be tomorrow).”

He also said that “It poisons the blessings of liberty itself” in that same paragraph when warning about too much law.

In an online search for the use of the words “false documents” under the US Code found in the Cornell Law School website, there are 1,604 pages of instances of the use of those words.

https://www.law.cornell.edu/search/searchResultsForm.html

(The above URL will only take you to the page where you would have to click on Code of Federal Regulations and then type in the words false documents in the search bar, which I am pretty confident few people would care to do so, but it can be done).

Of the 48 listed “Titles” under which those two words are found, none that I could find were to be found under Title 52, which is the Voting Rights tome. In fact if you choose the US Constitution under the list of Collections found on that Search Page, there are zero references to “false documents” in it.

And, in fact, as I surfed through these voluminous and incoherent documents the only thing that I could find that might be relevant to this case was to be found under 52 US Code Section 10102 (that’s in Chapter 101) which is a reference to the fact that “No officer of the Army, Navy, or Air Force of the United States shall prescribe or fix, by proclamation, order, or otherwise, the qualifications of voters in any State, or in any manner interfere with the freedom of any election in any State, or with the exercise of this free right of suffrage in any State.

These Michigan 16 Electors were exercising their free right of suffrage in their State where there were and still are voluminous accusations of ELECTION FRAUD.

So, is it an Officer of the State who is interfering with the exercise of their free right of suffrage, and is it time that We the People put a stop to this judicial, executive and legislative tyranny? I think it is, on both counts.

52 US Code Section 10102

Oh, and by the way, prior to the 2020 election there was a document that was being circulated in election circles. It is called Preventing a Disrupted Presidential Election and Transition. It was billed as being “election crisis scenario planning exercises.” It was published under what was called the Transition Integrity Project (TIP) that was formed under an organization called United to Protect Democracy created in 2019 under the leadership of Barack Hussein Obama, doncha know.

Here's an article about it:  Obama lawyers form ‘worst-case scenario’ group to tackle Trump.

On pages 17-18 under the subtitle Game Three: Clear Trump Win it states “The Biden Campaign began the game by encouraging three states with Democratic governors – North Carolina, Wisconsin, and Michigan – to ask for recounts. As the game developed, governors in two of the three (Wisconsin and Michigan) sent separate slates of electors to counter those sent by the state legislators.” So, in other words, it’s okay for thee but not for me, I guess.

Preventing a Disrupted Presidential Election and Transition

The trouble is that Republicans don’t know how to play games. If they did, they would have only sent Alternate Electors from States with Republican governors. Well, hindsight is 2020 as was the Year of Our Lord 2020 when, according to Ken Blackwell, The Greatest Electoral Heist in American History was perpetrated upon the American people.

Besides that, this is no game, and the survival of our Republic is at stake. We cannot allow this type of weaponized democracy to continue and so I have compiled a couple of suggestions:

1. The attorneys getting paid to represent the Michigan 16 would do well to stop ratifying these frivolous and dangerous lawsuits and call this what it is – a farce – instead of simply saying “Yes Your Honor, No Your Honor” as they cha-ching up a fortune in less-than-honorable earnings off of these innocent Michigan citizens.

2. The Republicans in the Michigan State House and Senate should walk off the floor in solidarity for The Republic; not to return; not to provide a quorum to the slimmest of Democrat majorities; not to allow any more of these ridiculous so-called “laws” to be foolishly enacted that are weaponizing our government in ways that were never intended by our Founding Families.

3. The MiGOP should applaud their new Chair Kristina Karamo as she is heard across the country on fabulous interviews like the one she did this week with Charlie Kirk.

Thank you Kristina.

Let’s pray the rest of the Republicans rise to your level of brilliance and start protecting Our Republic from enemies both foreign and domestic and spiritual, as they are constitutionally mandated to do using their temporary, limited, delegated authority that has been given to them by We the People.

The time has come to fight back with the tools of Ephesians 6:11-17.

AMEN 

 MCU is dedicated to seeing our generation of patriotic, Liberty-loving, law-abiding citizens of America carry on the legacy of the late MCU founder, our dearly beloved Norman Hughes (02/10/1943 - 10/03/2019) well into the future, so this current crisis can be resolved or destroyed before it completely alters the constitutional Republic that many of us have taken an Oath to protect, defend and serve.